To consider a report from the Head of Strategic Planning regarding variation of condition 2, 9 and 10 of Appeal decision reference PP/Q1770/A/11/2161324 (Planning Application Reference: 10/02712/CMA) to reshape and improve the existing peripheral north eastern landscape bund to facilitate enhanced screening from wider views into the site and improve biodiversity on the site's periphery and to accommodate a temporary wash plant operation in the southern section of the site for a period of twelve months only at Salvidge Farm, Bunny Lane, Timsbury SO51 0PG (No. 21/00588/CMAS) (Site Ref: TV066)
Minutes:
Revised Application - Variation of condition 2, 9 and 10 of Appeal decision reference APP/Q1770/A/11/2161324 (Planning Application Reference: 10/02712/CMA) to reshape and improve the existing peripheral north eastern landscape bund to facilitate enhanced screening from wider views into the site and improve biodiversity on the site's periphery and to accommodate a temporary wash plant operation in the southern section of the site for a period of twelve months only at Salvidge Farm, Bunny Lane, Timsbury SO51 0PG (No. 21/00588/CMAS) (Site Ref: TV066)
The Committee received a report
from the Head of Strategic Planning regarding a revised application
for variation to conditions at Salvidge Farm, following a previous
refusal.
It was acknowledged that a site visit had since taken place and
further discussions had resulted in the Environmental Health
Officer no longer objecting to the proposal.
Committee was shown a location plan of the area and the
relationship of the site to nearby developments and the road
network. The areas subject to noise conditions were also
highlighted to Members. An update report had been published and
provided to Committee, which covered minor changes to the report
and consultations as well as the Conditions.
The Committee received two deputations
on this item, along with the local Member, Councillor Nick
Adams-King. Councillor Bob Davis, Chairman of Timsbury and
Michelmersh Parish Council shared his concerns regarding noise from
the wash plant on site as well as the effect of the site on the
landscape. It was felt that whilst the new conditions did address
concerns to an extent, there was still potential for them to be
breached. It was also felt that the bunding and landscaping would
not mature in the 12 months proposed for the application
timeframe.
Michael Woodhall and John Palmer spoke on behalf of the applicant.
Mr Woodhall emphasised the importance of the site and it’s
history and Mr Palmer expanded how the shortage in aggregates meant
that the site was crucial. Mitigations had been put in place and a
commitment had been made for 320 plants for landscaping, including
already fully grown plants that would provide immediate benefits.
The Committee was also reminded that there were other sources of
noise in the area and not all could be associated with this
particular site.
Councillor Nick Adams-King thanked officers for their work on the
application and the applicant for the valuable site visit that took
place. Councillor Adams-King shared his concerns regarding the
application coming back for further permission after the 12months
had ceased and also of the suitability of the landscaping in the
winter.
During questions of the deputations, the following points were clarified:
· A liaison panel had been suggested and this would be looked into by the applicant
· It was accepted that it couldn’t be guaranteed that there would never be noise from the site
· 40dB was felt to be an acceptable level
· 40%-50% of the planting had already been started and established to assist with the noise and visual impact of the site
· Condition 3 would be completed three months of approval
During questions of the officers, it was clarified that:
· The Landscape Architect were satisfied with the screening and planting proposed for the site
· Enforcement for any noise over 40dB would be managed by the team and Condition 8 assisted with monitoring this
· The bunding was created using existing material on the site and the Environment Agency permit monitored any potential water-related issues
In debate, Members agreed the value of the site visit and were encouraged that the Environment Health Offcer was satisfied with the proposals. The Committee also welcomed a liaison panel being established and the monitoring of the site.
RESOLVED
Planning permission was GRANTED subject
to the conditions listed in Appendix A and the update
report.
Voting:
Favour: 13
Against: 0
Abstentions: 3
Supporting documents: